Page 53 - Social Enterprise A New Business Paradigm for Thailand
P. 53

1.9 Operational Definitions
               This study conducted in-depth interviews aligned with three primary research objectives: (1) to

               examine the current status of social businesses; (2) to explore exemplary social business models;
               and (3) to investigate the mechanisms for expanding the number of social businesses, commonly
               referred to as the social business ecosystem.

               To present a comprehensive and connected picture of the social business landscape, interviews
               conducted to  address  broader  research questions  employed  an inclusive definition of  “social
               business.”  In  this  context,  any  income-generating  activity  that  supports  social  initiatives  was
               included.  This  broader  definition  helped  uncover  the  motivations  and  driving  forces  behind
               businesses choosing to register as social enterprises under Thai law.


               In-depth interviews were conducted with four target groups, as outlined below:

               1.  Social businesses, further categorized into the following subgroups:
                   1.1 Businesses  with  the  goal  of  creating  employment  and  income  for  vulnerable,
                       disadvantaged, or marginalized populations;
                   1.2 Businesses  with  production  processes,  products,  or  services  that  help  resolve  social
                       problems, for example, by reducing global warming through clean or alternative energy
                       solutions, or by addressing pollution;

                   1.3 For-profit businesses that adopt sustainable and ethical practices to minimize negative
                       impact while maximizing positive contributions to society;
                   1.4 Conventional for-profit businesses that are legally obligated to return a portion of their
                       profits to society.
               The  research  placed  particular  emphasis  on  interviewing  organizations  that  were  legally
               registered as social enterprises, as compared to other subgroups in this category.

               2.  Non‑profit public‑interest organizations, including associations and foundations that conduct
                   revenue‑generating activities or belong to networks engaged in social business initiatives.

               3.  Community-based organizations, which were subdivided into:
                   1.1 Cooperatives, and
                   1.2 Community  enterprises,  local  organizations  focused  on  solving  issues  specific  to  their
                       community or local population groups.
               In addition to building a broader picture of the current landscape of social businesses, this study
               aimed to answer two important questions:

               •  What are the motivations driving businesses to register as social enterprises?
               •  What  are  the  advantages and  disadvantages  of operating  as  a  registered  social enterprise

                  compared to a cooperative or a community enterprise?



                                                                                                           20
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58