Page 329 - Social Enterprise A New Business Paradigm for Thailand
P. 329

1)  Groups with highly fragmented production capacity that are difficult to coordinate. These
                      groups require the use of digital technology or online platforms to aggregate producers and
                      develop prototype models that enable home-based work, such as using AI to create video

                      clips or process large datasets. To succeed, they need financial and technological support
                      from existing government agencies.

                  2)  Groups in which the producers are persons with disabilities who either lack specific skills or
                      demonstrate inconsistent capabilities. Although a substantial national fund exists to support
                      persons  with  disabilities,  it  remains  underutilized  due  to  limited  accessibility.  A  viable
                      development  strategy  would  involve  gathering  data  to  identify  market  opportunities
                      tailored  to  persons  with  disabilities  and  exploring  the  types  of  businesses  they  could
                      operate among themselves. It would also be important to help individuals in this group
                      prepare  project  proposals  for  their  own  development  or  for  the  benefit  of  their  peer

                      networks.  While  funding  is  already  in  place,  effective  management  and  facilitation  by
                      intermediary  organizations,  such  as  social  enterprises  or  mission-driven  nonprofits,  is
                      needed to bridge the gap and ensure these resources are used effectively.


                  11.4 Policy Recommendations

                  11.4.1 Public Policy

                  1.  Amend the Social Enterprise Promotion Act B.E. 2562 (2019), which has now been in force
                      for  five  years  and  is  due  for  review  and  revision  based  on  lessons  learned  from  its
                      implementation. The following amendments are proposed:

                      ▪  Revise the law to ensure that the Office of Social Enterprise Promotion (OSEP) receives
                         an annual budget allocation of no less than 100 million baht per year for a period of five
                         years. After this initial period, the budget should be reassessed based on the office’s
                         performance, operational capacity, and staffing needs.
                      ▪  Improve tax incentive measures by allowing investors to transfer their shares without

                         being required to return the tax benefits previously received. However, such transfers
                         should be permitted only if the shares have been held for at least five years and are
                         transferred exclusively to another registered social enterprise.
                      ▪  Reduce the reporting burden for small social enterprises with annual revenues under 10
                         million baht by allowing them to use simplified indicators or narrative reporting in place
                         of conducting a Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis for every organization.

                  2.  Clearly define the roles and budget utilization strategies for the newly established fund
                      under the Office of Social Enterprise Promotion (OSEP), especially given its limited staffing.

                      In the initial phase, priority should be given to activities with clearly measurable outcomes:

                      ▪  Establish  a  co-payment  system  or  financial  guarantee  mechanism  to  support
                         procurement  involving  social  enterprises  and  other  organizations,  particularly  in

                                                                                                          295
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334